日本樱花VPS评测 [复制链接]
查看:87 | 回复:8

yxzyxz001 · 发表于 2013-7-1 10:00:24

首先，感谢@sakura，发起了此次T楼活动。

本人也很性运地获得本次T楼奖品：日本樱花1G内存100G硬盘kvm vps
首先嘛，线路不错，不过晚上电信有点抽
CPU给的是双核[ol]

processor : 0

vendor_id : GenuineIntel

cpu family : 6

model : 44

model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645

stepping : 1

cpu MHz : 2400.242

cache size : 4096 KB

physical id : 0

siblings : 2

core id : 0

cpu cores : 1

apicid : 0

initial apicid : 0

fdiv_bug : no

hlt_bug : no

f00f_bug : no

coma_bug : no

fpu : yes

fpu_exception : yes

cpuid level : 11

wp : yes

flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon unfair_spinlock pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes hypervisor

bogomips : 4800.48

clflush size : 64

cache_alignment : 64

address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual

power management:

processor : 1

vendor_id : GenuineIntel

cpu family : 6

model : 44

model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645

stepping : 1

cpu MHz : 2400.242

cache size : 4096 KB

physical id : 0

siblings : 2

core id : 0

cpu cores : 1

apicid : 1

initial apicid : 1

fdiv_bug : no

hlt_bug : no

f00f_bug : no

coma_bug : no

fpu : yes

fpu_exception : yes

cpuid level : 11

wp : yes

flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon unfair_spinlock pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes hypervisor

bogomips : 4800.48

clflush size : 64

cache_alignment : 64

address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual[/ol]复制代码应该是G口，待会从别的vps上拖文件看看出口带宽[ol]

wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test

--2013-06-30 22:09:19-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test

Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 204.93.150.151

Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|204.93.150.151|:80... connected.

HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK

Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]

Saving to: `100mb.test.1'

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 14.6M/s in 5.0s

2013-06-30 22:09:24 (20.0 MB/s) - `100mb.test.1' saved [104857600/104857600]

[/ol]复制代码io表现不错[ol]

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync

4096+0 records in

4096+0 records out

268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 11.6068 s, 23.1 MB/s

[/ol]复制代码跑分1405，非常不错[ol]

BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: xxx.sakura.ne.jp: GNU/Linux

OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-358.11.1.el6.i686 -- #1 SMP Wed Jun 12 01:01:27 UTC 2 013

Machine: i686 (i386)

Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")

CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 (4800.5 bogomips)

Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET

CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 (4800.5 bogomips)

Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET

22:14:16 up 20 min, 2 users, load average: 0.01, 0.05, 0.07; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Benchmark Run: Sun Jun 30 2013 22:14:16 - 22:41:52

2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 15316711.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Double-Precision Whetstone 2395.8 MWIPS (8.4 s, 7 samples)

Execl Throughput 1674.1 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 479628.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 129438.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1061424.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Pipe Throughput 810475.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Pipe-based Context Switching 9548.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Process Creation 3460.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2621.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 788.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)

System Call Overhead 775170.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 15316711.9 1312.5

Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2395.8 435.6

Execl Throughput 43.0 1674.1 389.3

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 479628.4 1211.2

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 129438.4 782.1

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1061424.4 1830.0

Pipe Throughput 12440.0 810475.2 651.5

Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 9548.5 23.9

Process Creation 126.0 3460.0 274.6

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2621.6 618.3

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 788.5 1314.1

System Call Overhead 15000.0 775170.1 516.8

========

System Benchmarks Index Score 545.3

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Benchmark Run: Sun Jun 30 2013 22:41:52 - 23:09:28

2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 29954383.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Double-Precision Whetstone 4758.3 MWIPS (8.2 s, 7 samples)

Execl Throughput 6239.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 738389.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 199603.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1881061.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Pipe Throughput 1673057.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Pipe-based Context Switching 315431.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Process Creation 12788.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6769.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 894.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)

System Call Overhead 1486892.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 29954383.9 2566.8

Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4758.3 865.1

Execl Throughput 43.0 6239.0 1450.9

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 738389.0 1864.6

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 199603.6 1206.1

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1881061.1 3243.2

Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1673057.8 1344.9

Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 315431.0 788.6

Process Creation 126.0 12788.6 1015.0

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6769.4 1596.5

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 894.0 1489.9

System Call Overhead 15000.0 1486892.8 991.3

========

System Benchmarks Index Score 1405.9

[/ol]复制代码这家的控制面板不错，能自行上传iso进行安装，本身也提供linux多个版本的iso。如果想装windows，直接从美国小鸡拖过去就ok了。
vps代购地址：http://www.hostloc.com/thread-206675-1-1.html
T楼机地址：http://www.hostloc.com/thread-181606-1-1.html

shuir · 发表于 2013-7-1 10:00:42

一直在使用樱花的不过百度貌似不喜欢日本的ip

ninqq · 发表于 2013-7-1 10:20:14

ninqq 发表于 2013-7-1 10:20

一直在使用樱花的不过百度貌似不喜欢日本的ip
相比linode 如何稳定吗？

总是吵架的猪 · 发表于 2013-7-1 14:23:11

总是吵架的猪发表于 2013-7-1 14:23

相比linode 如何稳定吗？
稳定还行吧电信链接只能说一般
linode没使用过

ninqq · 发表于 2013-7-1 10:20:00

可以用来PT么？

胖子 · 发表于 2013-7-1 15:31:00

胖子发表于 2013-7-1 16:11

可以用来PT么？
还是谨慎使用吧。
好机器都被折磨死了。

sakura · 发表于 2013-7-1 14:23:00

谢谢楼主提供樱花VPS测评。
代购找QQ：465793847

sakura · 发表于 2013-7-1 16:11:12

多少钱一个月啊。。

五更琉璃 · 发表于 2013-7-1 18:12:28

五更琉璃发表于 2013-7-1 19:01

多少钱一个月啊。。
首月80，续费90.

日本樱花VPS评测 [复制链接] 查看:87 | 回复:8

日本樱花VPS评测 [复制链接]
查看:87 | 回复:8